home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Group 42-Sells Out! - The Information Archive
/
Group 42 Sells Out (Group 42) (1996).iso
/
hack
/
sniffers
/
sniffers.txt
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-12-29
|
7KB
|
172 lines
Subject: Re: Sniffers -- Long Reply, be forwarned.
This is a long responce.... be forwarned
"Karen E. Mitchell" <kmitchel@cftnet.com> wrote:
>
>Could someone please explain how a sniffer works? I know that it can be
>attached to (phone lines ?) to view data/passwords being transferred over
>a modem line.
I have not heard of a sniffer over a modem line, it seems kind
of pointless, as you would have to on one of the connections
points. Sniffers are usually (though not always, if you want
to fork out the dough!) software applications.
> How does it work?
Networks communicate with each other using something called a
packet. A packet contains all the addressing info, control,
error checking etc required by a network to deliver packet.
Also included would be the data.
On local area networks, packets are broadcast to all nodes
(read, computers) on the network (local, not internet!). Each
node will read the address in the packet. If the packet is
addressed to the node, the node reads it, otherwise it ignores
it.
A sniffer is a program that makes a copy of the packet and
stores the contents somewhere else (a file) for later perusal
by the user of the sniffer. By scanning through the file, it
is possible to see the data being transfered, which can be
passwords, but is 99.999% of the time data.
It should also be noted that most networks also come equiped
with software versions of ehternet sniffers, for use by the
adminitrators.
Hardware sniffers (lan-a-lizers) are devices that can be
plugged into a network via a port and are used to read the
packets for diagnostic information.
>What effect does encrypted data have on
>a sniffer? I would greatly appreciate any clarification.
Packets themselves are not encrypted, as they need to be read
by all nodes on the net. Encrypting the data however, means
that the data inside the packet is unreadable (unless, you can
decrypt it)
It should be noted that packets send on the internet are not
broadcast to all nodes (what a mess that would make!!). They
use a method called store and forward, where the packet is send
from server to server until it reaches its destination points
(only the servers in the path to the destination receive the
packet) Please note that server is braod... it can be any
number of devices on the net... routers, gateways, file servers
to name a few.
Hope that helped (I think it is all essentially correct.. I am
kinda tired right now)
A good book on internet communications/programming would be:
Internmet Programming by Kris Jamsa, PHD and Ken Cope
Jamsa Press, isbn 1 884133-12-6
I can't think of any good titles on lans, though any library
will have lots of resources.
Brian
From nntp.crl.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!daemon9 Tue Oct 31 05:56:50 1995
Newsgroups: alt.2600
Path: nntp.crl.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!daemon9
From: daemon9@netcom.com (Route)
Subject: Re: Sniffers -- Long Reply, be forwarned.
Message-ID: <daemon9DH9wqC.Fsu@netcom.com>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
References: <470v3r$dj7@tech.cftnet.com> <471onq$jok@sunburst.ccs.yorku.ca>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 1995 18:01:24 GMT
Lines: 84
Sender: daemon9@netcom6.netcom.com
On 30 Oct 1995 05:44:26 GMT Brian Claus (bclaus@calumet.yorku.ca) wrote:
| I have not heard of a sniffer over a modem line, it seems kind
| of pointless, as you would have to on one of the connections
| points. Sniffers are usually (though not always, if you want
| to fork out the dough!) software applications.
A packet sniffer, as I said before, is not 'placed' on a
communications medium. The are usally software on a device
the packets travel through. They can be hardware, however.
| Networks communicate with each other using something called a
| packet. A packet contains all the addressing info, control,
| error checking etc required by a network to deliver packet.
| Also included would be the data.
Depends what layer you are talking about. Sure, link and physical
layers uses packets (some term the physical as bits, and the link
as packets, but I don't make that distinction). Network layers
use datagrams, transports layers use segments...
| On local area networks, packets are broadcast to all nodes
No,no,no. On ETHERNETS they are. Token ring networks,
for example, DO NOT broadcasts packets in this manner. Token
Ring is a deterministic system. It is nice and orderly and
it passes a nice token around, checking to see if anyone has
any data to send or recieve.
| (read, computers) on the network (local, not internet!). Each
| node will read the address in the packet. If the packet is
| addressed to the node, the node reads it, otherwise it ignores
| it.
| A sniffer is a program that makes a copy of the packet and
| stores the contents somewhere else (a file) for later perusal
| by the user of the sniffer. By scanning through the file, it
| is possible to see the data being transfered, which can be
| passwords, but is 99.999% of the time data.
As a bit of trivia, about 1/2 of all TCP transactions
on the Internet are STMP based (email)....
| >What effect does encrypted data have on
| >a sniffer? I would greatly appreciate any clarification.
| Packets themselves are not encrypted, as they need to be read
| by all nodes on the net. Encrypting the data however, means
| that the data inside the packet is unreadable (unless, you can
| decrypt it)
No. Read my previous sniffer post. It has information on
link-to-link and end-to-end encryption.
| It should be noted that packets send on the internet are not
| broadcast to all nodes (what a mess that would make!!). They
| use a method called store and forward, where the packet is send
| from server to server until it reaches its destination points
| (only the servers in the path to the destination receive the
| packet) Please note that server is braod... it can be any
| number of devices on the net... routers, gateways, file servers
| to name a few.
Again no. Store and forward (message-switching) techniques are
not the predominant form of routing on the Internet. UUCP uses this
form of routing, and is intended for dial-up links, and is slowly
being phased out. UUCP is a seperate group of protocols and is NOT
in TCP/IP. The predominant form of routing on the Internet is
packet-switching. Data is broken down into datagrams and switched
from device to device until it reaches it destination, normally
with no reliability...
If anyone really wants, I can go into depth on packet switching...?
--
----| Infinity / Route / daemon9 |--------|------------------|--------------
--| Founding member: The 0x47 0x75 0x69 0x6C 0x64 | Finger for information |--
[RSADSALUCGARGOYLEIDEADESLUCIFERLOKIFEALSHAMD5HAVALSNERFU]
coming soon... the infonexus.... All of our prayers answered.